logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.10.25 2018나306377
임금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiff A shall be revoked.

Plaintiff

B, C, D, E, F, G, H.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company that operates a general taxi transport business, and the plaintiffs are those who have worked as a taxi driver by concluding a labor contract with the defendant.

B. According to the collective agreement and wage agreement, and the Plaintiffs’ working hours (i.e., the labor union between the Defendant and the Defendant’s workplace to which the Plaintiffs belong, the collective agreement and wage agreement concluded on May 27, 2013, the Plaintiffs’ working hours after June 1, 2013 are 156 hours (=6 hours per day, and 36 hours per week).

D. However, the number of taxi drivers in Daegu Metropolitan City, including the plaintiffs, shall be calculated on April 1, 2004 through April 1, 2004 in accordance with the Guidelines for Operating the Passenger Transport Service Act (Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport No. 625), and six-day work (five-day work, one-day rest) from April 1, 2004 to the present. The working hours to which the above collective agreement and wage agreement are applied in accordance with the above Acts and subordinate statutes shall be 6, 30 or 36 hours per day, and the working hours per month shall be 150 hours (=6 hours per day x 25 days per month x 35,000 hours per month x 25,000 days per month). However, this is not considered to be a general number of days per month, calculated on March 1, 204 as "250,000 days per day" and shall be determined as "360,000 days per day per month."

On May 27, 2013, the defendant entered into the above "Group-si Trade Union" agreement and wage agreement, and paid the amount of value-added tax reduction equivalent to KRW 120,000 for the month which was previously paid, including the amount of value-added tax reduction from June 1, 2013, to the plaintiffs including the amount of value-added tax reduction.

arrow