A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was working as a loan counselor at the SC Japan Bank E branch in Gangnam-gu Seoul on February 2, 2013 at the Seocho-gu Seoul, and was working as a loan counselor at the F branch in the past SC Japan Bank F branch in the SC Bank in the past, and (b) was called on the phone to the victim G, who was employed as a loan counselor, and thus

First of all, 81 million won is required to lend money.

0.2% interest of the principal shall be paid later than one month.

2. The payment shall be made until 30.

"Finally, it made false statements."

However, in fact, the defendant did not think that he would use money as a substitute patient loan from the victim, and was scheduled to pay H as an auction investment loan.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim in such manner as above, received KRW 81 million from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant on February 6, 2013, and received KRW 84 million from the victim through the same method, and acquired KRW 85 million from the victim to the same account on February 12, 2013, and acquired KRW 250 million in total by deceiving the victim to the same account on April 1, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit certificates;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347(1) of the choice of the punishment, the reason [the scope of recommending punishment] of the punishment of imprisonment [the grounds for sentencing of general fraud [the scope of recommending punishment] no basic area (10 million won or more, or less than 500 million won) [1-4 years] [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant is the first offender], and most of the criminal proceeds are deemed not to have been retained. However, the amount obtained by deception is large, and the victim wanted to be punished by the defendant, taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the punishment is large, and the punishment is determined as ordered.