logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.01.12 2016가단222593
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant B, the real estate listed in the attached Form 1, and the Defendant C, the real estate listed in the attached Form 3.

Reasons

1. The facts stated in the separate sheet do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the pleading in the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5. Thus, the defendants are obligated to deliver each building in the separate sheet owned and used within the plaintiff's business area to the plaintiff.

2. Defendant C alleged that it is impossible to comply with the Plaintiff’s claim before receiving the lease deposit, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the existence and amount of the lease deposit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow