1. All appeals by the plaintiff (appointed party) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial revision or addition as follows.

From the third three parallels of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant shall jointly and severally compensate the plaintiff, etc. for his/her property and mental damage, such as the statement in the purport of the claim.

Up to 11th to 16th day of the first instance judgment, the plaintiff and the selected parties E are married couple, and the plaintiff and the selected parties E are the children of the plaintiff and the selected parties E, and they are residing in 110 Dong 1802 of the instant apartment, the highest floor prior to 2008.

The 17th sentence in the first instance judgment " June 9, 2008" shall be amended to " June 6, 2008".

The 5th 8th son of the judgment of the first instance is amended to mean "(1) was rendered a judgment of winning a part of September 27, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive at that time."

The 7th 12 main text of the judgment of the first instance is to revise the Housing Act as the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 12115, Dec. 24, 2013); the 7th 13th 14th 7th 7th 14th 7th 14th 7th 14th 7th 14th 7th 200, respectively.

The 8th sentence of the first instance judgment "(the plaintiff asserted that he continuously requested the repair of defects since July 2009 due to water leakage damage caused by the rooftop rupture, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and it appears that it was conducted from October 201 to March 201, 201. As a result of the appraisal of defects in the 110 dong and 1802 of the instant apartment, the cost of repairing defects in the 110 dong and 110 dong and 1802 of the instant apartment was calculated as KRW 71,201 (the wife was calculated as KRW 621,164, and the wife was calculated as KRW 71,201 after the appraisal supplement, etc.).

. . ...