The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the damaged goods were returned to the victim of the instant crime, and the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim E is favorable to the Defendant.

However, if the defendant has a record of criminal punishment several times for the same crime, committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and again committed the crime of this case while under criminal trial, and comprehensively takes into account the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.