logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.29 2014가합204882
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 424,602,858 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from September 21, 2014 to October 29, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s mother, around October 200, C was pregnant and was under pre-exploitic diagnosis at G Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant’s hospital”) from January 6, 2001, and was given birth of the Plaintiff around H 13:20. The Plaintiff was diagnosed of low oxygen cerebral cerebral cerebriform, multi-cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebriform, and mathic mathic mathic mathic ma.

B. The Plaintiff’s parents and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) asserted that the aforementioned injury suffered by the Plaintiff was caused by the medical malpractice of the medical professionals in the hospital of the Defendants, and filed a lawsuit against the Defendants’ medical professionals in the hospital, including the Defendants, claiming compensation for damages with the Daegu District Court 2003Gahap8286.

(hereinafter referred to as “previous lawsuit”). (c)

In the previous litigation on July 11, 2006, Defendant E, a doctor only responsible for brain damage, etc. caused by low fertility, was in need of active measures to avoid a fatal danger, such as brain damage caused by thirrosis of the fetus, by attempting only a minute under the king improvement alcohol in order to avoid a fatal danger, etc., the Defendant E, a doctor who was in charge of only the part, was at fault on the ground that there was a lack of gyscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sche

On September 207, 2007, both the plaintiff and the defendant appealed and the appellate court was in progress (the Daegu High Court case 2006Na7519). In the above appellate court, the conciliation of the following (hereinafter “instant conciliation”) was established.

1. By October 19, 2007, Defendant D and E shall be paid KRW 80,000 to each Plaintiff A, but the said Defendants shall delay the payment of the said money.

arrow