logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.11.26 2020고단2619
강제추행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 7, 2020, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim D (one person, two-eight years of age) who was in the street currency in front of the exit-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul (C4) in order to say, “Ack-gu,” and forced the victim to attract the victim’s grandchildren.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in Chapter 1 of the Violence, Video CDs, submitted by the victim of each police statement made to D and E;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

1. Article 47 (1) and Article 49 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from an order to disclose or notify information, the proviso to Article 49 (1) and the proviso to Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the age, occupation, risk of repeating a crime, type and motive of the crime in this case, type of the crime in this case, process, disclosure or notification order, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the defendant's entry due to the crime in this case, the prevention of sex crimes subject to registration that may be achieved due to such order, and the effect of protecting the victims, etc

1. The proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, the proviso to Article 59-3(1) of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities (in full view of the defendant's age, family environment and social ties, records of crimes, details and motive of crimes, methods of committing crimes, the risk of recidivism, the risk of recidivism due to the employment restriction order, the disadvantage of the defendant resulting from the employment restriction order and the preventive effect of the sex crime that can be achieved thereby, the defendant is found guilty of the facts constituting the sex crime subject to registration of personal information.

arrow