Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was divided into the Diplomatic Officer of the Diplomatic Association in Seodaemun-gu Seoul and the E Newspaper publisher, and on April 15, 2013, the Diplomatic Officer of the Diplomatic Association in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and the Diplomatic Officer of the Diplomatic Association in Seoul, Seomun-gu, Seoul, and the Diplomatic Officer of the Diplomatic Officer Association in Seoul, and on April 15, 2013, the defendant is a pastor belonging to the Diplomatic Officer Association, the victim F, and the victim G.

1. On May 28, 2013, at E office located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment for death (2007Gadan796) of a person who gets invaded by a license without a license, on the bulletin board of the E Newspaper (I). Around May 28, 2013, the Defendant was also sentenced to a punishment for death (2007Gadan796) of a person who was in a crisis due to a false person’s misrepresentation of the president. Around now, the Defendant was unable to proceed with the E office in front of the Defendant’s sexual pastor (JJ) who was in a lawsuit seeking the return of investment amount (92012Gadan16271) by failing to pay a large amount of remaining money, and was unable to do so.

6.23.23. 23. The same year

7. 28. The same text was published in E newspapers.

Accordingly, the defendant, by pointing out facts, damaged the reputation of the victim F.

2. The defendant has committed the same harm;

7. Around 23, at the above bulletin board, the title "No person has a certificate of euthanasia in the above bulletin board" was read as a non-qualified person who does not have a certificate of euthanasia.

G on September 5, 1995, GC submitted a photograph of a shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot-shot

A notice to the purport of "," and a statement to the same effect was published in the above newspaper around that time.

However, the victim G was not a non-qualified person because he graduated from the new abuse school and was awarded a save in lieu of the saves of saves of saves.

As a result, the Defendant, by pointing out false facts, damaged the reputation of the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1.