beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 278,834,203 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 20% per annum from June 10, 2015 to September 30, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is a company with the purpose of the garment overseas production management business, etc., and the defendant is a company with the purpose of manufacturing and wholesale and retailing clothes.
B. Around May 2014, the Defendant: (a) formulated a plan for the sale of swelves in GS home shopping; and (b) entered into a contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff to provide the Plaintiff with the original swelves by processing the original swelves in Vietnam’s factory and supply it to the Defendant.
(hereinafter “instant supply contract”). C.
In accordance with the above supply contract, the Plaintiff: (a) from October 8, 2014 to November 7, 2014, around 10, 2014, up to 22,947, totaling 13,622 for children in scamet scamet, and 9,325 for adults, brought in and supplied to Vietnam for the Plaintiff; and (b) the price is KRW 1,370,368,043 (including value-added tax).
① On December 10, 2014, the Defendant paid the original amount of KRW 360,081,920 to the original unit of supply; ② paid the total of KRW 130,650,000 on eight occasions from October 15, 2014 to January 16, 2015; ③ paid the Plaintiff’s account KRW 40,000,000 on December 24, 2014; and ③ deposited KRW 40,000,000 on January 13, 205; and KRW 50,000,000 on February 24, 2015; and ④ paid the credit price of KRW 32,241,294,297,294, etc. on eight occasions, including:
E. On December 20, 2014, the Plaintiff brought in the Republic of Korea 2,99 additional scamet 2,99, and intended to supply it to the Defendant. The Defendant asserted that he should refuse to take over the Chapter 1,500 among them and deduct the amount of the original unit corresponding thereto. Since then, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to deduct the total amount of KRW 37,500,000 from the supply price of the scamet 37,500,000, which is set as 25,000 won per the above scamet.
F. On January 26, 2015, the Defendant returned 1,957 of the Gyeyang Dokdong’s ticket supplied by the Plaintiff, asserting that the head of 1,957 was an inferior product, and demanded the deduction of KRW 109,004,90 for the supply amount corresponding thereto, and the Defendant returned the same day.