A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jeonju District Court on April 11, 2008, and on January 13, 2012, on which the Jeonju District Court issued a summary order of 2 million won for the same crime.

As above, the Defendant is also a person who violates Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions and is engaged in the driving of a bareboat cargo vehicle.

On August 21, 2014, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.143% on blood alcohol level at 0.17: (a) while driving the said vehicle, and continued to proceed along the eM5 car driven by the victim D (Nam, 35 years old) who was under the influence of the Defendant due to negligence while neglecting the duty of eM5 car at the front line while driving the eM5 car in the front line at the terminal located along one lane of the two lanes, from the surface of the driver's length distance at the terminal in the front line, the Defendant received the back portion of the eM5 car driven by the victim F (F, South and 41 years old) who was under the influence of the Defendant. Accordingly, the Defendant continued to stop in the front line, and the Defendant was driving by the victim H and 49 years old who was under the influence of the said eM5 car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol due to the difficult driving of the motor vehicle due to the influence of alcohol, suffered from the victim D and the victim'sJ (the 32 years old), who was on board the said SM5 motor vehicle, the injury of the catum base requiring treatment for about two weeks, the injury of the catum base requiring treatment for about two weeks, the injury of the victim K (the 5 years old and the 5 years old), the injury of the catum base requiring treatment for about one week to the victim L (the 1 year old and the 1 year old), the victim M (the 51 years old and the 53 years old), the victim N(the 53 years old and the 53 years old), who was on the said catumy taxi, in need of treatment for about two weeks.

b)a summary of the evidence;