logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.01.08 2015고단1789
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 19, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Seoul Southern District Court to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act. On March 17, 2014, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, and on June 5, 2015, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 6 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

1. On October 27, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.128% during blood without a driver’s license in the section of approximately 1.5km from the two kinds of roads located in the Seogu Seo-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, to the two-lane roads located in the middle-gu, Seogu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu. In short, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.128% during blood without a driver’s license.

Accordingly, the Defendant, without a driver's license, driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, even though he had a record of punishment on two or more occasions.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in C with any violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., flight vehicles) and any violation of the Road Traffic Act (ii).

At the time of the day specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the said car with alcohol content of 0.128% in blood without a driver’s license, and proceeded with six lanes in front of the two kinds of four streets located in the Seo-gu Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, with three lanes a speed of about 70km in time, depending on the four-lanes from the four four-lanes off from the four-lanes off.

Since there is an intersection where a signal apparatus is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the signals by checking well the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected to pay attention to a stop signal while drinking, the Defendant was negligent in proceeding in violation of the signal.

arrow