logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.04.19 2015고단1316
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, in collusion with Brokers and C, prepared a false employment certificate and a false lease contract, and submitted the relevant documents to the financial institution, and applied for a worker’s lease loan. The lessor, upon receipt of a request from a financial institution to verify the actual status of the lease contract, applied for a worker’s lease loan and received it, and conspired to commit the crime by dividing the loan by dividing the loan.

According to the above public offering, around April 2012, 2012, the hubker prepared a false certificate of employment and other related documents as if the Defendant worked in D company, and made a false lease agreement on the “Seoul-si E Apartment-si, Gyeonggi-do, 103 402” owned by C, a lessor, and transferred the Defendant to file an application for a loan.

On April 2015, the Defendant applied for the loan of employee deposit money at the central branch of the old-gu branch of the bank, which was located in the Young-gu, Gyeonggi-do, for the loan of employee deposit money, submitted a false employment certificate and a false lease contract as if the loan was a genuine document, and applied for the loan of employee deposit money as if the loan was actually used as a deposit for the lease deposit.

However, the defendant did not have worked for the D company, and in fact did not have entered into a lease contract for the above apartment, and even if he did not obtain a worker's lease loan, he did not intend to use it as a deposit for the lease deposit.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the brobeer and C on May 4, 2012, received money from the damaged person to the C's account in the name of C to transfer KRW 50 million under the name of the employee's pre-paid housing loan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.F.

arrow