Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts
On September 15, 2015, the Defendant driven a DNA-based car with C around 16:10 on September 15, 2015, and led the Defendant to drive a three-lane road in the direction of the 6th intersection distance between Ansan-si and the 6rd intersection in Ansan-si.
At this point, the intersection where signal lights are installed, and the speed of restriction is 60 km a speed, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the speed limit and operating the steering gear and brake accurately.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim E-driving which changed the car line from one lane on the e-driving side to two lanes due to the negligence that the speed of the restriction exceeds 34.1km per hour, and received the F-Oba in front of the left side of the said car.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim under Section 2 of the upper right line, which requires approximately 16 weeks of treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A report on the actual condition of traffic accidents (1) (2);
1. A traffic accident analysis and appraisal report;
1. Medical certificate (the defendant and defense counsel asserts that the defendant's overwork and the traffic accident in this case are not related to the person.
The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., (i) the defendant's negligence is found to have driven in excess of the restricted speed on the part of the victim E-driving who illegally crosses a crosswalk, which is approximately one meter away from the right-hand side of the road in the direction of the passage, while driving at the intersection between 89.3km and 97.5km a two-lanes on the left-hand side, the speed of which is 60km per hour, and the left-hand side of which is 89.3km or 9.5km a speed of left-hand side; and (ii) the defendant's negligence is found to have driven in excess of the restricted speed on the part of the victim E-driving who crosses the crosswalk without permission from the right-hand side of the road in the direction of the passage, based on the stop line.