(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.11.09 2018고정870

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.11.09 2018고정870

절도

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 17:57, 2018, the Defendant: (b) one set of door-to-door items, which was separated from the door of door-to-door rolling stock open in the door of door-to-door rolling stock operated by the Victim E (hereinafter “E”) (a 33-party female; hereinafter “E”) who is a security guard of the Defendant’s apartment (hereinafter “the apartment complex of this case”); (c) the apartment complex F of the instant apartment complex of this case is equivalent to the market price of 4,200 won;

G. After finding the instant matter (hereinafter referred to as the “instant matter”), the victim laid down the instant apartment complex in order to deliver the instant apartment complex, and then stolen it.

[In regard to this, although the defendant / the defense counsel citing the instant selective items at the time, it was true that the management office, rather than trying to steal, has left the door by closing the door at a low time, and brought the instant selective items to the management office on the way on which he goes to work following the following day, and has left it to the management office to the victim.

(1) However, the apartment complex security guards ordinarily acquire the goods of this case shall normally communicate the goods to the occupants indicated in the goods, and if the addressee is unknown, a report shall be filed with the relevant home-type company, etc. to find it to the owner, and shall contact the police station to find it to deal with the article to be found.

“The result of this Court’s factual inquiry about the management office of the apartment complex of this case. Although the recipient of the instant apartment complex of this case is apparent, the instant apartment complex of this case was placed in place of ordinary business as a security guard, and the Defendant was investigated by the investigative agency, and (2) if he was to know that the instant apartment complex of this case had been built for women, he was in place of the match security room (not bringing to the house of this case).

“The Defendant stated to the effect that it was “,” and ③ unlike the Defendant’s change, has the instant door-to-door distribution.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고정349

-인천지방법원 2014.10.10 2014노1458

-수원지방법원 2014.11.05 2014고단4490

-서울북부지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고정2053

-대구지방법원 2019.10.24 2019고단3116