A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum term of one year and short term of ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny against victims C;

A. At around 01:00 on September 15, 2012, the Defendant, at the “E church where D victim C is a pastor, destroyed the wall that contains KRW 800,000 in cash, which was owned by the victim on the books of the office.

B. On September 20, 2012, around 02:00 on September 20, 2012, the Defendant, at the same place as the above paragraph (a) of this Article, destroyed one net gold fever equivalent to the market price of KRW 2,00,000, which was owned by the victim who had been on the books of his office at the same place, and stolen one ggal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal

C. At around 02:00 on October 1, 2012, the Defendant, at the same place as the above paragraph (a), stolen the Plaintiff’s cell phone 3 mobile phones equivalent to KRW 900,000, at the victim’s market price located in the relevant floor.

2. Larceny against victim F;

A. At around 09:52 on October 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft from “GPC bank in Namyang-si, GPC; (b) by taking advantage of the gaps, the victim F was in front of the computer, the market price of the victim’s possession, which was 90,000,000 won.” (c) around 03:00 on October 9, 2012, the Defendant: (d) took one mobile phone of gallon in the “HPC bank in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Hayang-si, Hayang-si,” which was in front of the computer, brought about a theft of the victim’s share of KRW 900,00,00, the market price of the victim’s ownership, which was in front of the computer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement in C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting occurrence;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Consideration of the crimes committed repeatedly in a short period after a suspended sentence, including the same kind of crime as the reasons for sentencing under Article 2 and Article 60(1) of the Juvenile Act, becomes final and conclusive, and the same criminal records are many.