beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From June 9, 2009, the Defendant is the representative director of the victim E-the-counter Dispute Resolution (hereinafter referred to as the "D"), from around 2006 to around 206, who has been in office as the representative director of the victim E-the-counter Dispute Resolution Committee (hereinafter referred to as the "E") and the victim E-the-counter Dispute Resolution Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "F") and has overall control over the operation of each of the above companies, company fund management, accounting management, etc.
1. A Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) has embezzled KRW 1,506,300,000 for personal purposes, from November 8, 2015 to June 10, 2016, by using the victim D company’s funds total amount of KRW 1,506,30,000 for a personal purpose, from November 30, 2012 to June 10, 2016, after transferring from the bank account under the name of the victim D to the bank account under the name of the Defendant’s name of the Defendant, as G wage that retired from office around October 8, 2015.
2. On October 14, 2015, the Defendant embezzled KRW 115,00,000 for the victim E company funds, which he/she had been in his/her custody for business purposes, transferred from the bank account under the name of the Defendant to the bank account under the name of the Defendant, and used them for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc. from November 29, 2013 to June 14, 2016.
3. As each representative director of the victim D, E, and F, the Defendant in occupational breach of trust is not likely to cause any problem in the recovery of loans in order to lend the company’s funds to any other person, and there was an occupational duty to ensure that there is no risk of property damage or property damage to the victim corporation by taking reasonable and reasonable measures for recovery of the principal amount by taking measures for recovery of the principal amount due to the provision of sufficient security from the other person.
However, the defendant on October 2014.