logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.10.31 2014고단1373
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person running an entertainment drinking club in the Goyang-dong-gu E branch office in Manyang-si. Defendant B is a director of the above main office, who is in charge of the management of office office and the settlement of accounts such as sales, etc., and Defendant C is a person who manages entertainment reception workers as the head of the above main office.

around 23:00 on December 5, 2013, the Defendants directed 1, the head of the above entertainment drinking house parking room, to provide the above entertainment reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with I, L, and M to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant B and C

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant A;

1. Each interrogation protocol on H, G, I, L, and M;

1. Some of the suspect interrogation records ofO or P;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. On-site photographs, Defendant A did not instruct Defendant B and C of the arrangement of commercial sex acts, and received a report that there was an arrangement of commercial sex acts later, Defendant A cannot be deemed to have conspired with the above Defendants.

However, according to the evidence mentioned above, Defendant B and C received sexual traffic prices and hotel usage fees when they want to engage in sexual traffic, and instructed an employee in charge of parking management to drive an entertainment drinking house and a guest vehicle to move to K hotel, and K hotel.

arrow