logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.11.29 2013노2881
폭행
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) followed the victim’s lower part; (c) had the victim go beyond the lower part; and (d) even if the Defendant did not have the victim’s lower part of the grounds for appeal.

Even if the defendant was found not guilty of the facts charged of this case, the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, since the defendant's awareness of the shoulder and the part of the arms was exceeded the floor, it should be deemed that the defendant exercised the force of force against the victim.

2. Determination

A. On November 16, 2012, around 13:28, the summary of the facts charged is the intermediate manager of the D store located on the first floor of the C shopping mall underground, and around November 16, 2012, the Defendant used the victim F (year 42) to operate and dispose of the D store due to the poor condition of the POP store located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, while engaging in the reverse effect of the D store. The Defendant assaulted the victim with the lower part of the victim.

B. The lower court determined as follows: (a) comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s video CDs, video CDs submitted by the Defendant, video CDs submitted by the victim, and the statement made by the Defendant and the victim, the victim is a director of the company managing the said shopping mall; (b) the Defendant is the manager of the said shopping mall; and (c) the victim was the manager of the DNA store on November 16, 2012 (the original court stated on November 16, 201, but it appears to be erroneous, but it appears to be erroneous) around 13:24; (d) the victim destroyed the H burial in G and the POP store located in the Defendant’s store; and (e) the victim was spawned with the spawn; (e) the Defendant’s G was prevented; and (e) the Defendant tried to deduct the spawn from the victim while keeping the spawn and the spawn part from the victim’s back at around 13:29.

arrow