beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 16,042,205 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 3,957,794 to Plaintiff B; and (c) from March 21, 2018 to each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Plaintiff A filed a lawsuit against D with the Daegu District Court Branch Decision 2010Kadan7124 (hereinafter “instant judgment”), and the said court rendered a judgment that D, on August 17, 2010, paid the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 27 million and the amount calculated by 20% from June 25, 2010 to the date of full payment (hereinafter “instant judgment”). The instant judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
Plaintiff
B alleging that it has a loan claim against D and filed an application for a loan payment order with the Daegu District Court Residential Support 2017j.8 with respect to E, the heir of the network, on January 12, 2017, the court issued the payment order (hereinafter “instant payment order”) to pay the amount of KRW 15.6 million within the scope of the property inherited from the network D and the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 15.6 million per annum from January 13, 2017 to the date of complete payment. The instant payment order was finalized around that time.
B. On October 2, 2016, at around 00:18, G taxi (hereinafter “instant taxi”) was driven and resided at the seat of the cultural center, F, while driving one-lane of the two-lanes of the road in front of the HH store at the seat of the cultural center, led to the death of D (J students, hereinafter “the deceased”) by failing to find any DNA that was accumulated on the crosswalk in the front line of the said taxi driving direction, while driving the said taxi, and driving the two-lanes of the road in front of the HH store at the seat of the cultural center.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
K is the deceased’s spouse, E, and L are the deceased’s children, and K and L reported the renunciation of inheritance to stay at the Daegu District Court on November 14, 2016 and received a judgment from the above court on December 12, 2016 (No. 2016-Ma276), and E reported the qualified acceptance to the same court on November 14, 2016, and received a judgment from the above court on December 12, 2016.
(2016 Maz. 277)
K, E, and L are funeral expenses for the Defendant, who is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant taxi, as Seoul Central District Court 2016Kadan5310964.