logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.12 2017고합177
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with the preparation, posting, posting, posting, or installation of posters, placards, or other publicity facilities under the Election of Public Officials Act, or damage or remove them without justifiable grounds.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인 A는 2017. 4. 23. 02:50 경 의정부시 신곡로 36 삼익 아파트 104 동 후문 출입구에서 아무런 이유 없이 선거관리 위원회에서 담벼락에 첩부한 제 19대 대통령 선거 벽보를 발로 수회 걷어차고, 계속하여 기호 D 번 E 후보의 양쪽 눈을 소지하고 있던 라이터 불로 지지는 방법으로 훼손하고, 피고인 B은 발로 선거 벽보를 걷어찼다.

As a result, Defendants conspired to damage election posters without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Request for the appraisal of field fingerprints and report on investigation (in response to the result of the on-site fingerprint appraisal);

1. On-site CCTV photographs and CCTV photographs (specific suspect);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV for crime prevention;

1. The Defendants: Article 240 (1) of the Act on the Election of Public Officials and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the order of provisional payment;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 4 million won; and

2. The sentencing criteria are not set for offenses against which the sentencing criteria are not applied.

3. Although the Defendants’ crime of this case committed by the Defendants, in light of their right to know, the fairness of election, and the usefulness of election management, the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak, taking into account the following circumstances into account: (a) the Defendants’ mistake is recognized and in depth reflected; (b) the Defendants are primary offenders; and (c) the Defendants appear to have committed contingent crimes under the influence of alcohol without any political intent or purpose.

In determining the amount of fine, all the circumstances mentioned above and others.

arrow