1. The Defendant’s KRW 302,554,823 within the scope of KRW 412,10,000 and KRW 99,373,497 among the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 2,205.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 3, and evidence No. 4, the defendant is obliged to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 25% per annum from February 2, 2015 to the date of full payment of the contract delay interest rate of KRW 302,554,823 within the limit of KRW 412,10,000,000, and KRW 99,373,497 among them.

The defendant asserts that delay rate is excessive, but the defendant's assertion is without merit, considering the amount loaned by the non-applicant company to B, the size of the loan, the date and maturity of the loan, the interest rate, the defendant's limit of guarantee for the service of the defendant, etc.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.