The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is acknowledged that the operation of each illegal game of this case is likely to cause excessive speculative spirit and undermine sound labor awareness, and thus there is a need to strictly punish the defendant. The size of the game room operated by the defendant is relatively large and considerable operating period, the transfer of the place for six months after the first time crackdown on June 201 and the operation of the illegal game room repeatedly over five times, such as making the defendant make a false statement to an investigation agency to the effect that he is the owner of the game room business on the ground of the so-called bar president, etc., there is a very good nature of the crime. The fact that there is a history of crime subject to suspended execution due to the same crime, and in full view of all the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of each crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the judgment of the court below that the defendant's punishment is too inappropriate and it is not reasonable to find the defendant's assertion that it is unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.