The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., e., g., e., g., e., g., 7 years old-old 7 years old-old 7 years old-old 7 years old-old 7 years old-old 7 years old-old 7 years old-old 7 years old-old 7 years old-old 7 years from driving negligence, resulting in the victim's mental body, which is the incurable disease, and the victim's failing to receive the statements from the victim. In light of all circumstances, the sentence of imprisonment

[2] The court below's determination is unreasonable.

2. On March 28, 2010, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, who was negligent in performing the duty of front-time care on the road in front of the 101-ho-won apartment complex in the direction of the Defendant while driving a vehicle on March 17:10, 201, and driving a vehicle in the apartment complex where human traffic is frequent, resulting in throst and stress disorder in need of treatment for about 8 weeks in front of the above cargo vehicle, and eventually resulting in the victim's mental retardation, which is an incurable disease. However, when driving a vehicle in the apartment complex where human traffic is frequent, it should have paid more attention than normal, and the degree of the Defendant's negligence is weak, and as a result, the victim's mental retardation of the disease in this case caused the injury in front of the victim, which is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, the defendant's time to commit the crime of this case, and the defendant at the time of the accident of this case also paid a certain degree of attention to the defendant, and had shocked the victim crossing the road between the vehicles parked on the road while driving the road between roadway and India, and immediately after the accident of this case, the defendant tried to confirm the victim's condition and forward it to the hospital, but the victim was tried to return it to the hospital.