A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:20 on October 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was in front of the “△△△△ cafeteria” of the victim D’s operation in the Gunposi; (b) was night, and subsequently, (c) opened a locked window to steals the goods, such as foodstuffs owned by other victims, and entered into the restaurant to steals, and attempted to steal the goods; (d) but (c) did not commit a attempted crime on the wind that the police officer sent out upon receiving a report from a person who was killed and wounded and arrested.

Accordingly, the defendant, at night, invadedd the building managed by the victim, trying to steals the victim's property, and attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. The rationale for sentencing under Articles 342 and 330 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts was committed, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant is favorable circumstances.

On the other hand, on October 1, 2015, three years of suspended sentence for one year of imprisonment for the same crime was sentenced to imprisonment on October 1, 2015, and the judgment was finalized on October 9, 2015, but it was only wrong, and on the other hand, seven times of juvenile protective disposition from 2011 to 2013 are disadvantageous.

Comprehensively taking account of these circumstances, the sentence as ordered shall be determined.