1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance and the defendant's grounds for incidental appeal are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. Even if each evidence submitted in the court of first instance is presented in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance except for the judgment on the part concerning future medical treatment costs in the judgment of the court of

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is as follows: (a) supplement the judgment on the grounds for limitation of liability among the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in paragraph (2); and (b) refer to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance as well as the determination on the future treatment expenses.

2. The supplementary and modified part of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “Immediate Plaintiff”) Nos. 10 through 15 are as follows.

In light of the fact that the point of accident in this case slved from the window of this case slved, so persons passing this point are obliged to pay attention not to obstruct others' passage, but the plaintiff is driving at a speed higher than those of others passing through the accident point, thereby hindering the defendant's course, and that the degree of injury is increased due to the plaintiff's rapid speed, the plaintiff's negligence can be deemed to have contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damage caused by the accident of this case, so it is reasonable to limit the defendant's responsibility to 40%, and the defendant's liability is changed from the 5th to the 1st 7th eth eth 1 in the judgment of the court of first instance.

C. According to the appraisal in the first instance court of 2,50,000 won on June 17, 2017 at the time of the accident at the time of the time of the occurrence of the expenditure for future treatment costs, the household items used the household items in order to fix the part of the Plaintiff’s left-hand pet abandonment.