logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.09.04 2015고단356
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 1995, the Defendant entered into a check contract with a branch of a national bank and entered into a check transaction under the name of the Defendant.

"2015 Highest 356"

1. On July 14, 2014, the Defendant issued one check number “F”, “F”, “3,00,000,000”, and one copy of the bank household check in the name of the Defendant, which is named as “F”, “F”, “3,00,000,000”, and “F date” under the name of the Defendant in the “E” in the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul.

In addition, the Defendant issued 13 copies of the household check equivalent to 27,50,000 won in total as stated in the attached list 1 to 8,10,000 as well as the attached list 1 to 8,10 to 14, but each holder of the check proposed payment, but the prosecutor stated that the shortage of deposits or the disposition of suspension of transactions did not receive deposits as a shortage in the indictment.

However, according to the written accusation submitted as evidence, only each check listed in the attached list 1 and 2 is not paid as a shortage of deposit, and the remaining checks were not paid as a suspension of transaction.

not paid as such.

"2015 Highest 1297"

2. On September 15, 2014, around September 15, 2014, the Defendant issued the check number “G”, the face value “3,00,000,00”, the date of issuance “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu”, and the bank coefficient table in the name of the Defendant who is the issuer “A”.

In addition, from that to October 6, 2014, the Defendant issued three copies of the household check equivalent to KRW 7,100,000 in total as indicated in Table 2 Nos. 1 through 3 of the Crime List from that to that to that of October 6, 2014 and presented the payment on the payment date, but each holder of a check did not receive the payment suspension disposition.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Highest 356"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each accusation (excluding an order No. 18 of the evidence lists), each family check copy (excluding an order No. 19 of the evidence lists) "2015 Godan1297";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written accusation shall be a list of evidence;

arrow