The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and two years of probation) declared by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The court below determined the above punishment against the defendant on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. In addition, considering the following factors: the defendant, who had been sentenced to several criminal punishments, including six times of punishment due to the act of fraud, such as this case, committed several frauds again, and the defendant again committed each of the frauds in this case; although the victim was agreed upon with the victims, the circumstance in which the prosecutor asserts that the victim suffered losses in the course of the agreement with the victims as a reason for sentencing disadvantageous to the trial in the trial, such as mental and economic pain, is deemed to have been sufficiently taken into account when the court below imposed the punishment. In addition, considering the fact that the defendant shows a attitude to reflect in depth in the course of each of the crimes in this case, and that the victims of the crime of fraud did not have been punished against the defendant, the court below's sentencing is too uncompared and it cannot be recognized that the defendant exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.