The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the defendant's mistake is divided into his own mistake, and that the defendant agreed with the victim F.

However, the crime of this case is not very good; the defendant again committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime committed by the same kind of crime even though he had been tried at several times; the defendant did not reach an agreement to recover from or reach an agreement on damage to the victim E; the sentencing balance with the same crime; the defendant's age, sex and environment; the defendant's age, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.