1. The period set forth in Article 1 of the performance angle as shown in the attached Table 2 against the Defendant (Reserve Counterclaim Plaintiff) B by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The facts following the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by comprehensively taking account of the respective entries (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and the overall purport of the pleadings (the document No. 2 (certificate) is presumed to be the authenticity of the entire document as a whole, since there is no dispute over the part of the defendant’s seal impressions in relation to the performance certificate No. 2 (certificate). The defendant B does not confirm this document, and without any evidence to acknowledge it).

On June 18, 2012, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 60 million from Defendant B. On June 18, 2012, the Plaintiff issued and delivered to Defendant B a promissory note with the issuer and the payee B on June 17, 2012, and on November 30, 2012, the due date, and on November 30, 2012. The Plaintiff drafted a notarized bill verifying that there is no objection even if he/she was immediately subject to compulsory execution.

B. On December 14, 2012, the Plaintiff issued and delivered to Defendant B a promissory note with the same face value, the issuer, and the addressee of the said Promissory Notes at the same time, the issue date on December 14, 2012, and the due date on February 28, 2013, and drafted a notarial deed of a bill to the effect that a compulsory execution is recognized and accepted by the law firm Jeong-dong Certificate 01299.

C. On December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) issued to Defendant B a notarial deed to the effect that a promissory note with the Plaintiff, an issuer, and an addressee B is to be issued and delivered on December 31, 2012; and (b) issued on February 28, 2013; and (c) issued a notarial deed to the effect that a compulsory execution under the 01336 certificate was accepted and accepted.

(hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”). D.

On January 29, 2013, the Plaintiff repaid the principal and interest of KRW 60 million to Defendant B.

E. The Plaintiff and Defendant B are as follows on February 8, 2013.