logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2007. 06. 29. 선고 2006누4691 판결
자료상으로부터 수취한 세금계산서가 사실과 다른 세금계산서인지 여부[국패]
Title

Whether a tax invoice received from data is false or not.

Summary

No evidence exists to deem that an act was related to the Plaintiff, such as filing an accusation against the supplier on the tax invoice on the data, but the name of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff-related person was not shown in the relevant data, and thus cannot be deemed as a false tax invoice.

Related statutes

Article 16 (Tax Invoice)

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this case are as follows: "No. ...... evidence" in the last part of "A.8" of the judgment of the court of first instance, and "No. .......... evidence" are followed. In full view of the purport of the whole pleadings in the statement No. 8, the plaintiff shall refer to the tax invoice of this case to the non-party company for a total of KRW 847,246,00,00, which is currently supplied by the non-party company and paid the price in full, as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "...........", it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow