logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.04.05 2015가단3694
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 32,597,840 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from January 8, 2015 to April 5, 2016, and the next day.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition (based on recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in each of the evidence referred to in subparagraphs 2, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, and subparagraph 6, 7, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19, and the purport of the whole pleadings);

A. On April 31, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with BSON Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) to deliver to the Nonparty Company 11,50 won/value added tax (including value added tax) 13,200 won / 15, 200 / 2,300 / 130 / 200 / 13,00 / 13,00 / 11,50 / 70 / 11,50 / 11,50 / 150 / 15, 2014.

B. The plaintiff A.

On September 24, 2014, between B and a former secretary in charge of the Defendant’s business affairs, and the Plaintiff sent the original materials of the clothing to the Young Tech, Inc. (hereinafter “YTB”) located in Vietnam, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Young Tech, using the original materials of the clothing from Young Tech to supply the garment goods, such as salary agents, according to the design required by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant contract”).

C. The work order provided by the Plaintiff to the Defendant in relation to the instant contract is written with “Mock neckk (the shape that ends at the bottom of suck as a multi-party with suckk’s suck),” and all the day and shape are as follows: “KW015”.

(other than a single mixed rate). (d)

While the Defendant was processed under the instant contract, it is difficult to wear clothes in the event that he was processed with the design directed by the Plaintiff due to the difference of the force of the original group offered by the Plaintiff, and it is not possible to process the design as another design for each original unit. Under the judgment that each original unit cannot be processed with another design, the Defendant arbitrarily sold the design of the wooden part to the lower lower direction than the design directed by the Plaintiff.

arrow