beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the D coffee shop in front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) there was a so-called “Laart sales business that had been carried out and renounced five (5) years before the Switzerland Mana; and (c) the Chinese business would buy the so-called “Laart sales business.”
I would like to lend money to the same person so that he/she can do so.
The phrase “the phrase was false.”
However, there was no fact that the Defendant had been carrying out the Liber in the Philippines, and attempted to borrow money to use it for the purpose of living expenses, etc. as above, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money as there was no property or income.
Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received transfer of KRW 1,000,000 from the account (G) in the name of the Defendant’s wife from the victim; and (c) received KRW 230,659,400 over 31 times from around that time to December 24, 2014, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness E;
1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including part concerning the E-examination);
1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;
1. Statement protocol by the police for E;
1. Details of each financial transaction;
1. In light of the following circumstances revealed by evidence duly adopted and investigated, the investigation report (to hear statements by a witness H telephone and report on the recording file), investigation report (to examine and report the contents of admission and withdrawal), investigation report (to attach business-related judgments) (a) can be fully recognized that the Defendant, as shown in the facts charged, deceiving the victim as well as 230,659,40 won.
(1) The Defendant invested KRW 180,350,000 in a project for the sale of the Republic of Korea, among others.
The argument is asserted.
However, the defendant did not submit all objective data to prove his/her shares and to whether he/she actually invested the above money (the 194 page of the investigation record), and