1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance to be stated is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance as described in paragraph (2) or adding it as described in paragraph (3). Therefore,

2.The addition shall add to not more than 3 pages 5 lines:

F. In the past, the previous registration of the Plaintiff was divided into 163 square meters prior to C, Nam-si, Namyang-si, which was the object of the provisional registration of the Plaintiff, into 163 square meters prior to C, 248 square meters prior to C, Nam-si, Nam-si, Namyang-si, and 317 square meters prior to C, Nam-si, Nam-si

On May 10, 2018, L248 square meters prior to the Namyang-si was expropriated.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, 19 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

3. The part 6 pages 8, "A No. 8," written on the 6th line 8th line, shall be sealed as "Evidence 3, 8, 16-2, and 7 of A," and the "no. 9 or 18 lines" shall be accepted in the case as follows.

On March 4, 2015, the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 215 million up to May 31, 2015, and KRW 215 million up to June 30, 2015, respectively.

2. If the defendant delays the performance of the above 1. Paragraph 1., the above amount shall be paid plus damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum from the day following the above payment date to the day of full payment.

“After the completion of conciliation, the Plaintiff filed a request for auction of the Defendant’s share (814.5/1,392) among the instant real estate on June 9, 2015, based on the above protocol of conciliation, and the auction procedure was in progress to the court of the District Court of the Republic of Korea on May 9, 2018, but the withdrawal of the application was completed on May 9, 2018. The Plaintiff filed a request for auction of 688.5/1,392, which is part of the Defendant’s share in the instant real estate (No. 29), based on the executory protocol of the instant case (No. 2015s. 201107), and filed a request for auction of the instant real estate with the Government District Court M&D.

The plaintiff filed a request for auction as above on May 6, 688.