The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (one and half years of imprisonment, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the amount of damage is seized from the defendant to the victim at the time of arrest, and the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, it is difficult to arrest the general policies and incentives of the organization of the Bosing criminal of Bosing crimes by taking the form of an organization overseas, such as China. While it is necessary to refrain from participating in the crime by placing the head of the Tong, remittance and face-to-face books that are essential for the completion of the crime, it is possible to eradicate the criminal of Bosing crimes, and the defendant is in charge of receiving and remitting the amount of damage from Bosing crimes to China, and the degree of participation is not easy.

In addition, given that the Defendant’s age, sex, growth environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant records and arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.