The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal, although the defendant could be found to have received one million won in return for the introduction of an attorney-at-law as stated in the facts charged, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of facts.

2. Direct evidence that conforms to the facts charged in the instant case’s judgment is practically related to the E’s investigative agency and court’s statement.

However, E, as early August 11, 2017, went out as a candidate with the Defendant in the 7th election of Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, the nationwide election of Jindo-gun, 2018. However, in light of the circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant and E received cash KRW 1 million since he did not go in Jindo-do consistently, it is difficult to recognize the facts charged of the instant case only with the Defendant’s statement in the situation where the Defendant and E were inconsistent with the Defendant’s assertion and lack of objective physical evidence, and there is no other evidence to prove the facts charged.

3. In addition to the circumstances stated by the lower court, namely, E, around August 28, 2017, stated to the effect that “the defendant remitted the defendant with no meal expenses by making a phone call with the attorney-at-law to the effect that there is no meal expenses,” which led to the reversal of the statement in the lower court’s court that “the defendant sent the defendant’s account number by sending it to the defendant.”