Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the defendant's customer, and the victim C is the victim's employee.
On June 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) delivered the PC purchased from the D1st floor located in Daegu Suwon-gu E on June 19, 2017 to another PC; and (b) provided a phone call to the store for an unauthorized installation; (c) on the ground that the victim was able to respond to the phone in an indefinite manner; and (d) provided a phone call to the store.
Mad hand assaulted the victim's left side at one time.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.
According to the records, the victim C withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant around September 22, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.