Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 11, 2011, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of two million won for the crime of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's Net Branch, and on July 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime in the same court on July 5, 2012 and violated the provisions of the Road Traffic Act prohibition on two or more occasions.
On April 26, 2015, at around 23:22, the Defendant driven a 30-meter-D coos car on the roads front of the Influence, which was under the influence of alcohol with 0.083% of blood alcohol content, on the roads in front of the Influence, which were located in the said roads.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on detection of drunk driving, report on the circumstances of drunk driving, and inquiry about the results of crackdown on drunk driving;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 60 (3) of the Juvenile Act;
1. The fact that the ordinary blood alcohol concentration is relatively lower than that of the defendant, and that the ordinary blood alcohol content is relatively lower than that of the defendant, other conditions for all kinds of sentencing recorded in the records, such as the age, character, conduct and environment, etc., are comprehensively considered in light of the fact that the ordinary blood alcohol content of the defendant is relatively lower than that of the defendant, and that there are three previous convictions that are disadvantageous to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, such as the same kind of criminal records that are disadvantageous to the defendant