Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operated D in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from July 30, 2012 to July 29, 2014.

On July 30, 2012, when the Defendant entered into a credit card transaction agreement with the victim E, and kept and preserved various support equipment, including credit card terminals and radio terminals owned by the victim on July 29, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the sum of KRW 1,878,000, totaling three of the credit card terminals owned by the victim at the same place as above (total 1,188,000), one radio terminal (total 450,000), and three signature tags (total 240,000).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. A contract for the use of credit card transaction approval, a written estimate (the following circumstances recognized by each evidence at the time of the sale, i.e., the devices, etc. as indicated in the judgment, which are the amount equivalent to the amount of KRW 9,806,50, which is subject to a credit card transaction approval agreement and a written estimate (the amount of subsidies that the Defendant

The application of the law to specify the amount and number of units separately from each other, and to specify the "free lease", and to consider the fact that the victim requested the return of the terminal, etc. as indicated in the judgment of the defendant on the ground of the breach of contract as stated in the judgment of the defendant, the victim has the obligation to keep the terminal, etc. as stated in the judgment of the defendant, and

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shall be determined in full view of the background leading up to the embezzlement of the terminal, etc. in the judgment of the defendant, the amount of damage, and other circumstances such as the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment.