logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.12.19 2013고단1259
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 11, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (e.g., after-accident), as a business operation around 08:50, while driving a B rocketing car with the blood alcohol content of 0.122% under the influence of alcohol, and driving one-lane between the two-lanes of the community credit cooperatives, located at the center of the Gu and U.S. at the center of the Gu and U.S. at the center of the Gu and U.S. at the center of 42 degrees, the Defendant was negligent in driving the steering system in the course of driving by negligence while neglecting the steering system in the state of drinking and neglecting the duty to stop and waiting for customers, and received the part on the left right side of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop the said taxi owned by the victim Sung-si due to the foregoing occupational negligence and did not take measures necessary for the occurrence of a traffic accident, even though he/she damages the said taxi to have an amount equivalent to KRW 1,113,328.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) committed an accident in the state of drinking, and escaped without taking any measures after causing the accident, while driving the road in front of 48-lane 7,00,00 in the old Si/Gu, by neglecting the steering gear in a drinking state and neglecting the duty of steering at all times and neglecting his/her duty of steering, and obtained the retaining wall installed on the right side of the road due to occupational negligence of driving the vehicle. The Defendant was able to receive the front gate part of the Froscar car of the victim E(35 years old) who affected the central line by his/her shock, and who was in the atmosphere of the signal

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Written estimate (incept 63) and written diagnosis;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, on-site photographs, and a de facto survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on proper initiative of, and reports on the statement of status of, a prime driver;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow