The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 05:00 on January 6, 2013, the Defendant and C assaulted the victim F’s satise with the left part of the victim F, following the victim F (29 years of age), with the victim F’s satise and batf with her f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’ f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f

Accordingly, the defendant and C assaulted the victim F and the victim G in common.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the results of this court’s verification and the examination of the suspect’s interrogation of C, G, and F, the Defendant: (a) was in the studio of C and C; (b) was in the studio of C and C; (c) was in the studio of C and C; and (d) was in the studio with C and C having satum satum satum in the studio; and (c) was in the studio of C and C having satum satum satum in the studio; (d) was in the studio of C and C having satum satum satum in the studio; and (e) was in the stude of C and C having satum satum before satum satum; and (e) the Defendant was in the satum of G and satum satum in the shape of G and satum.

B. The above facts were stated that C did not see the shape that C initially saw with F, and later lost its spirit, and that C was unable to be deemed as having a certain day since C was satisfed.