Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment, 1 year and 6 months) of the lower court’s punishment (e.g., confiscation) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the lower court’s punishment is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the arguments in this case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the records, the lower court appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various reasons for sentencing asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor, and there seems no special circumstance to ex post facto change the sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.