logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.12.06 2016가단6650
손해배상(자)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. On April 3, 2013, at around 16:30, Plaintiff A driven C Otoba and proceeded with the direction of a sound transformation station from Samsung Home Pusspison site to the direction of a sound transformation station, depending on four-lane distance in the direction of the direction of the YOba-dong and the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction of the direction.

Plaintiff

A, after the running signal of a vehicle is changed to a stop signal, passed the intersection by entering the intersection in violation of the signal (hereinafter referred to as the “instant intersection”) and passing through the intersection from the right side of its running direction to the left side, and received the part on the left side of the D Driving Eworka car (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”) proceeding to the instant intersection in accordance with the direction signal of the vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant is an insurer who concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant passenger car.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 3, 10, 22, 23 (including additional numbers), Eul 6 and 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs asserted that at the time of the accident in this case, the plaintiff A had already entered from the stop line to the intersection in this case. Thus, even if the driver of the vehicle in this case was changed to the straight signal, the driver of the vehicle in this case must start after confirming the vehicle already entered the intersection and is proceeding without such confirmation, and therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case.

As to this, the defendant asserts that the accident of this case occurred due to the violation of the intersection stop signal by the plaintiff A.

3. The driver of a vehicle driving along an intersection where traffic is controlled by judgment signals, etc., shall be sufficient when other vehicles are believed to observe traffic regulations and take appropriate steps to avoid collision, and the other vehicles shall make a signal, unless there are special circumstances.

arrow