1. The Defendant’s KRW 190,089,010 and KRW 184,997,010 among the Plaintiff and KRW 5,092,00 from January 21, 2016.

Plaintiff’s assertion

The main point is that the plaintiff is a company engaged in food materials distribution business, etc., and the defendant is a company engaged in food distribution business.

The Plaintiff sold food materials, including fishery products, to the Defendant from April 2015 to March 31, 2016, and the Defendant did not pay some food materials.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 211,467,262 won and delay damages.

Judgment

1) Judgment as to the cause of the claim 1) A without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3 (if available, including the number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

According to the purport of each statement and oral argument, the Plaintiff is a company engaged in food material distribution business. The Defendant is a company engaged in food, etc., and the Plaintiff is a total sum of the supply price and tax amount stated in the evidence No. 1 of KRW 226,696,293 from April 2015 to October 2015. The amount equivalent to the total sum of supply price stated in the evidence No. 1 of KRW 81,674,298 from December 2015 to March 3, 2016. The Plaintiff and the Defendant supplied considerable food materials to the Plaintiff, respectively. The Plaintiff and the Defendant did not separately provide for the due date for the performance of the food material cost payment of KRW 26,69,293 from October 2015 to October 16, 2015. The Defendant received the remainder of the original evidence payment order of KRW 360,674,298 from the Plaintiff through the service of the original document of this case, and the Defendant received the original evidence payment of KRW 16816.

Judgment on the defendant's defense of repayment 1.