logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.12.16 2016고단1732
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On June 16, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court’s Support for Incheon District Court, and on May 21, 2012, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】 Although the Defendant had had a history of driving under the influence of alcohol twice again, he/she driven B LV motor vehicles from the road in front of the Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-si in the state of drinking alcohol level of 0.191% around August 13, 2016 to the road 69-1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the control of drinking driving, that on the control of drinking driving, that on the control of drinking driving, and that on the state of drinking drivers;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the trial proceedings of this case, including the fact that the probation and the order to attend a lecture had a history of being subject to three times criminal punishment due to drinking driving for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the fact that the offender is aware of and reflects the crime, the fact

arrow