logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.10.22 2019고정413
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On May 15, 2019, the Defendant driven the above taxi on May 11, 2011:30, and made the left turn at the speed on the right turn from the edge of the drinking felel in the northwest-gu, Seoan City.

At the same time, crosswalks are installed. In such cases, if a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle reduces the speed to the person engaged in the driving of the motor vehicle, well sees the right and the right, and pedestrians wear the crosswalks, he/she has the duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalks, check the safety of pedestrians first, check the safety of pedestrians, and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and continued to turn to the left at the same speed, and the victim E (the 64 years of age) suffered the damages of the victim E (the 64 years of age) from the left side of the moving direction to the right side, and went beyond the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about three weeks due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the occurrence of E traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the provisional payment order is that the defendant gets injured by the victim by cutting the crosswalk, and this does not apply to the case where the defendant's negligence is minor.

However, the defendant does not have the same criminal record, and does not seem to have serious injury to the victim, and the fact that the victim does not want punishment by mutual consent with the victim is favorable.

In addition, the defendant's age, character, character and environment.

arrow