All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the punishment imposed by the court below (the fine of KRW 5 million for the defendant A, the fine of KRW 3 million for the defendant B) is excessively unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendants did not have any previous conviction or fine beyond the previous conviction or fine, and that all of the instant crimes were led to confession and reflect, etc. are favorable to the Defendants.

On the other hand, the crime of arranging sexual traffic requires strict punishment in that it has a lot of social harm, such as harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, and the period of committing the crime by the Defendants is short, and the number of crimes is also limited, etc. that are disadvantageous to the Defendants. In light of the aforementioned circumstances and other circumstances, taking into account all the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendants’ age, character and behavior, motive for committing the crime, degree of participation, means and consequence, and the circumstances after committing the crime, the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.