1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 17, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) requested the Defendant to repair and repair the building of the 34th floor in Chang-gu, Chang-si; (b) concluded a construction contract with the construction cost of KRW 6.5 million; and (c) concluded that the construction cost was KRW 6.5 million.

(hereinafter “instant construction contract”). B.

From October 19, 2017 to October 29, 2017, the Plaintiff performed repair and repair works, such as the rooftop waterproof construction of the building in this case, the construction of a 1st floor fluent fluor, a part of the outer wall of the building, and the horizontal construction of the floor of the outdoor parking lot.

C. The Defendant remitted to the Plaintiff KRW 2 million on October 17, 2017, which was the date of entering into the instant construction contract, and remitted KRW 1.5 million on October 27, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1, 5 and 7, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

가. 당사자의 주장 요지 1) 원고 원고는 이 사건 공사계약에 따른 공사를 모두 완료하였는데, 피고는 공사대금 650만 원 중 350만 원만 지급하였으므로 원고에게 나머지 공사대금 300만 원을 지급할 의무가 있다. 2) 피고 이 사건 공사계약은 1층 외벽 일부 제거 및 샷시(창호), 칸막이, 방화문 설치 공사(이하 ‘창호공사 등’이라 한다)까지 포함하여 공사대금을 650만 원으로 정한 것인데, 공사대금 중 350만 원은 원고에게 직접 지급하였고, 나머지 300만 원은 원고의 요청에 따라 위 창호공사 등을 수행한 D에게 수표 100만 원을 지급하고, 2017. 11. 8. D가 지정한 계좌인 E(D의 조카) 명의 계좌로 200만 원을 송금함으로써 공사대금을 전부 지급하였다.

B. In light of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff and the Defendant appears to have agreed to the total construction cost as KRW 6.5 million including the building repair and repair works at the time of the instant construction contract, and it is reasonable to view D as having performed the said construction works at the Plaintiff’s request.

(1) D shall be October 2017.