Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around 13:50 on October 12, 2015, the Defendant knew that the Victim E (E, 25 years of age) was different from the Defendant’s deniedr, and that the Victim E (E, and 25 years of age) did not have a usual appraisal in the D-1 factory assembly site located in Yong-gun, Yong-gun, Namnam, the Defendant inflicted on the Victim’s head three times at the time of the Victim’s head, i.e., metal scrap (16.5cm in length, 16.5cm in width, 5.5cm in width).
Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Statement made by each police officer of the E and F;
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (referring to the parts damaged by the victim, the iron plates used by the suspected victim, etc.), and the written diagnosis of injury;
1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. One year of imprisonment to be suspended;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the circumstances before the opening is remarkable considering favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) of the suspended sentence is that the instant crime was committed by the Defendant with metal scrap, which is a dangerous article, and thus, the injury was inflicted upon the victim due to the failure of the method of the crime and the nature of the crime is disadvantageous to the Defendant.
However, the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case as a substitute for and against it, and the defendant seems to have caused chemical damage to the victim with his wife, and the degree of injury to the victim is relatively minor to the extent that it requires two-day medical treatment. The defendant agreed that the defendant had been living in the Republic of Korea for eight years, and the defendant had been engaged in his occupation in his occupation in good faith. The spouse seems to work together with the Republic of Korea and live in Korea before two years, but if the judgment of conviction becomes final and conclusive due to the crime in this case, the defendant is China.