The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the court below’s imprisonment for up to six months) is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the defendant has the intention to mislead and reflect his/her own mistake; (b) the applicant’s investment from an individual investor due to privatization of tobacco business has not come to this case because he/she did not want to be punished against the defendant; and (c) the victims are suffering from damages to the victims.

2. Although the judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances: (a) the defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; (b) the defendant committed the instant crime; (c) the amount obtained by deception from various victims; and (d) all other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of the instant case, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.