1. The counterclaim Defendant is one of the area of 800 square meters in the area of Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun;

(a)for each of the annexed drawings 1 to 4, and 1;

1. The fact that the ownership transfer registration has been completed in the name of the non-resident on May 25, 2009 with respect to the 800 square meters wide (hereinafter “instant real estate”). The fact that the counter-defendant constructed and owned a cement block building (hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground of part 9 square meters in the part (a) (hereinafter “instant site”) attached to the instant real estate connected each point in sequence with the indication 1 through 4, and 1 of the drawings among the instant real estate, that the counter-defendant owned the instant building on the ground of the 9 square meters wide (hereinafter “instant building”) may be recognized either as having no dispute between the parties or in full view of the following: (a) evidence No. 1-3, No. 1-2, and No. 2; and (b) the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the request for the survey and appraisal with respect to the head of the branch

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the counterclaim Defendant is obligated to remove the instant building to the counterclaim and deliver the instant site, as it owned the instant building on the instant site owned by the counterclaim. Thus, the counterclaim Defendant is obligated to remove the instant building to the counterclaim and deliver the instant site.

3. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case against the Plaintiff is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.